Reformer Pilates Vs Pilates

When people ask me the difference between Pilates and reformer Pilates, what they usually mean is one of 2 things. Either they are standing in a studio foyer choosing between 2 class types, or they have done a few mat classes at home and are wondering whether the machine is worth it.

The honest answer is that they are the same method. Same principles, same founder, largely the same exercises. What changes is what you are working against, and that one change cascades into almost everything else.

What they have in common

More than the marketing suggests. Both are Pilates. Both come from the same method, both are built on control, breath, precision and centring, and both spend most of their time asking your deep core to stabilise while your limbs do something else.

If you took a mat class and a reformer class from the same instructor on the same day, you would recognise the same exercises in both. The hundred, roll ups, leg circles, side kicks, teaser. The names do not change. What the exercise asks of you does.

So this is not a choice between 2 different types of training. It is a choice between 2 ways of loading the same training.

The one real difference

Mat Pilates loads you with gravity and your own body weight. That load is fixed. If an exercise is too hard, your only options are to modify the shape or stop.

Reformer Pilates loads you with springs on a carriage that slides. That load is adjustable, and here is the part most people miss. Springs do not only add resistance. Depending on how the exercise is set up, the springs can also assist you.

That is why the reformer can make the same exercise both easier and harder than the mat version. A roll up on the mat is a fight against gravity with nothing to help you. On the reformer, straps can support the movement so you learn the shape properly. Meanwhile a plank on the mat is a static hold, and a plank on a moving carriage asks your shoulders and core to control an unstable surface as well.

Side by side

The practical differences, in the order they tend to matter.

Resistance. Mat is body weight only. Reformer is adjustable springs, which can add load or take it away.

Support. Mat gives you the floor. The reformer gives you a headrest, shoulder blocks, a footbar and straps, which is why it is so often the choice when someone is working around an injury.

Progression. On the mat you progress by changing the exercise. On a reformer you progress by changing the spring, which is a much finer adjustment and much easier to track week to week.

Learning curve. Mat is faster to start. A reformer takes a session or 2 before the setup stops feeling fiddly.

Cost. Mat classes are cheaper, and mat at home is free. Reformer classes run higher, and a machine at home is a real purchase.

Space. A mat rolls up. A reformer needs a footprint, though a folding model gets that footprint back when you are done.

Variety. Both have plenty, but the reformer has more, because every exercise has a spring range and a set of accessories behind it.

Which one is harder

Neither, and I know that is unsatisfying, so let me be more specific.

A well taught mat class is harder than most people expect, because you cannot hide. There is no spring to help you and no carriage to brace against. If your core is not doing the work, the exercise simply does not happen.

A well taught reformer class is harder in a different way, because the machine will happily let you load an exercise beyond what you could ever do on the floor. The hardest sessions I have ever done were on a reformer. So were some of the easiest.

What actually decides difficulty is the instructor and the springs, not the equipment category. Anyone who tells you the reformer is the easy option has been to the wrong class.

Which one gives better results

For strength and visible tone, the reformer generally gets there faster, and the reason is not mysterious. Progressive load is what drives adaptation, and springs give you progressive load in small, repeatable increments. Body weight does not.

For body awareness, alignment and the core control that underpins everything else, mat work is superb and arguably better, because nothing is holding you in position.

For working around an injury, the reformer wins on support, which is why physiotherapists here use them so heavily. Clinical Pilates is largely reformer based for exactly that reason, and if you are training around a specific injury you should be doing it with a physio rather than from a blog post.

If you want the full comparison of the 2 as workouts rather than as equipment, I wrote that in reformer Pilates versus mat Pilates as a full body workout, and the timelines for either in how long it takes to see results.

Which one should a beginner start with

Start with whichever one you will actually keep doing, which sounds like a dodge and is the single most useful thing I can tell you.

That said, here is how I would choose. Start on the mat if you want to test whether you like Pilates at all, if budget is the deciding factor, or if you want to build the fundamentals before you add a machine. A few weeks of mat work makes your first reformer sessions considerably less confusing.

Start on the reformer if you are working around a back, hip or knee that does not love floor work, if you have tried mat classes and found them either too hard to hold position or too easy to progress, or if you already know you want to build strength rather than just move.

If you are brand new to the machine itself, my beginner guide to reformer Pilates covers what the parts do and what a first session looks like.

Why most people end up doing both

Almost everyone I know who has been doing this for a few years does both, and not because they planned it. Mat work fills the days a machine is not available, travels, and keeps the fundamentals honest. Reformer sessions do the loading and the progression.

That combination is also the honest case for a machine at home. Not that the reformer replaces the mat, but that owning one removes the timetable, which is what turns 2 sessions a week into 3 or 4 without anyone deciding to try harder.

If space is the concern, the Onyx Fold Reformer is the model I point most people at, because the room gets its floor back between sessions. A jumpboard and box comes with every FitBoutique reformer and covers the cardio side the mat never really does. If you want to compare across the range against the room you have, I did that in which reformer fits your space and budget, and if you would rather just ask, get in touch.

Frequently Asked Questions